The Microsoft MSIX packaging format is designed to simplify and unify the Windows app installation experience, but transitioning to MSIX can present challenges, particularly for organizations with complex legacy systems. MSIX aims to replace older formats like MSI, App-V, and EXE, offering better security and app management features. However, moving to MSIX introduces certain difficulties that developers and IT teams need to address.

Challenges in the move to Microsoft MSIX

Greg Lambert
November 22, 2024
3 minutes

Major Challenges in the move to Microsoft MSIX

The Microsoft MSIX packaging format is designed to simplify and unify the Windows app installation experience, but transitioning to MSIX can present challenges, particularly for organizations with complex legacy systems. MSIX aims to replace older formats like MSI, App-V, and EXE, offering better security and app management features. However, moving to MSIX introduces certain difficulties that developers and IT teams need to address.

1. Application Compatibility

A major challenge in adopting MSIX is application compatibility. Many enterprise applications rely on legacy technologies that may not work seamlessly with the MSIX format. Applications that use custom drivers, system-level services, or have deep system dependencies may experience issues when packaged as MSIX.

Additionally, MSIX enforces strict isolation rules that prevent direct modification of system-wide files or registry settings, which may require substantial reworking of older applications. These changes ensure that the system remains stable and secure, but they can also break compatibility for applications that depend on deeper system access.

For more information on MSIX compatibility, visit the official MSIX compatibility documentation.

2. Lack of Support for Some Features in MSIX

While MSIX brings numerous benefits, it currently lacks support for several features that developers may be used to in other formats, particularly MSI and App-V. For example, custom actions—which allow developers to run scripts during installation—are not supported in MSIX. This presents a challenge for applications that rely on custom scripts for post-installation configuration.

Additionally, MSIX still has limited support for services and drivers, which are critical for many applications, particularly those that interact with hardware or require persistent background services. This limitation may require significant modifications to the application code to fit within the MSIX framework.

For details about MSIX limitations and unsupported features, check MSIX features and limitations.

3. Learning Curve and Tooling

Adopting MSIX requires IT teams to become familiar with new packaging and deployment tools, such as the MSIX Packaging Tool and the Windows Package Manager. These tools provide a streamlined process for creating MSIX packages but require training and expertise to use effectively.

Developers must also adhere to strict MSIX packaging guidelines, including file structure restrictions and Digital Certificate signing. Signing an MSIX package ensures that the app is trusted, but managing certificates can be complex, especially for organizations with many apps or distributed IT teams.

For a guide on using the MSIX Packaging Tool, visit MSIX Packaging Tool documentation.

4. Enterprise Infrastructure Changes

Transitioning to MSIX can impact broader enterprise infrastructure. Organizations that rely on older app deployment tools such as System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) or Group Policy may need to integrate newer systems like Microsoft Intune to support MSIX effectively. This transition can require significant time and resources.

Additionally, converting existing App-V packages to MSIX is not always straightforward. Microsoft provides a conversion tool to assist with this process, but some applications may require manual intervention, particularly those with complex dependencies.

More details on deploying MSIX in enterprise environments can be found here: MSIX Enterprise Deployment.

5. Security and Management Concerns

While MSIX offers improved security through its containerization model, this also introduces new administrative requirements. For instance, every MSIX package must be signed with a trusted certificate, adding administrative overhead for IT departments. Managing these certificates and ensuring that all apps are trusted within an organization is essential, but it also complicates the deployment process. For information on MSIX security, visit MSIX Security.

Readiness can help!

With our combined approach of algorithmic and automated runtime testing Saas offering, we can ensure that all of your applications are tested and ready for “Day One” of your migration and will keep testing to ensure that each update does not have an impact on your application portfolio.

You can find out more about our Windows 11 testing service here: https://applicationreadiness.com/wp-content/uploads/Application-Readiness-for-Windows-11.pdf

Greg Lambert

CEO, Product Evangelist
Greg Lambert is the CEO and product evangelist for Application Readiness Inc. Greg is a co-founder of ChangeBASE and has considerable experience with application packaging technology and its deployment.

Planning business modernization projects?

  • Windows 10/11 migration
  • MS server 2022
  • Migration to Azure

Is your application estate ready?

Assurance.

Unbounded.

3 months of patch protection, assessments and dependency reports for your entire portfolio.

  • No cost
  • No limit of applications
  • No software needed
  • No infrastructure required
  • No obligation
Contact us to get started